翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Greifswald University Hospital
・ Greifswald University Library
・ Greifswalder Oie
・ Greifswalder SV 04
・ Gregory Thompson
・ Gregory Thompson (writer)
・ Gregory Tifernas
・ Gregory Township, Mahnomen County, Minnesota
・ Gregory Tsamblak
・ Gregory Tucker
・ Gregory Ulmer
・ Gregory University
・ Gregory V
・ Gregory V of Cilicia
・ Gregory V of Constantinople
Gregory v Rangitikei
・ Gregory v. City of Chicago
・ Gregory v. Hartley
・ Gregory v. Helvering
・ Gregory V. Palmer
・ Gregory Vajda
・ Gregory van der Wiel
・ Gregory Venables
・ Gregory VI
・ Gregory VI of Cilicia
・ Gregory Victor Babic
・ Gregory VII
・ Gregory VII of Cilicia
・ Gregory VII of Constantinople
・ Gregory Vlastos


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Gregory v Rangitikei : ウィキペディア英語版
Gregory v Rangitikei

Gregory v Rangitikei () 2 NZLR 208, (1994) 6 TCLR 199 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the sale of property by tender, confirming that an offer inviting tenders to be submitted for the purchase of something did not amount to an offer capable of acceptance to sell that property, but instead merely amounted to an invitation to treat. It reinforces the English case of Spencer v Harding (1870) LR 5 CP 561. However the Court also ruled that there was a breach of the Fair Trading Act (1986).
==Background==
The RDC advertised some surplus land or sale by tender, with the important caveat of "highest or any tender not necessarily accepted". During the tender process, the RDC discovered that they had previously agreed to sell the property to a neighbouring property owner Roberts.
Ultimately, Gregory was the highest tenderer, although his offer did not meet the council's reserve, and the council declined all tenders. The RDC then proceeded to exclusively negotiate a sale to Roberts, without giving Gregory a chance to purchase the property.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Gregory v Rangitikei」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.